Comments for jonathan gray http://jonathangray.org Sat, 22 May 2010 17:04:02 +0000 hourly 1 Comment on Bibliographica – for the collaborative development of bibliographies by Bibliographica: A New Project from the Open Knowledge Foundation: « ResourceShelf http://jonathangray.org/2010/01/22/bibliographica/comment-page-1/#comment-857 Bibliographica: A New Project from the Open Knowledge Foundation: « ResourceShelf Sat, 22 May 2010 17:04:02 +0000 http://jonathangray.org/?p=414#comment-857 <p>[...] itself, is a long-held dream of Jonathan Gray, OKF’s Community Coordinator – a commons of open data surrounding scholarly communications. [...]</p> [...] itself, is a long-held dream of Jonathan Gray, OKF’s Community Coordinator – a commons of open data surrounding scholarly communications. [...]

]]> Comment on Bibliographica – for the collaborative development of bibliographies by Open Knowledge Foundation Blog » Blog Archive » Bibliographica, an Introduction http://jonathangray.org/2010/01/22/bibliographica/comment-page-1/#comment-849 Open Knowledge Foundation Blog » Blog Archive » Bibliographica, an Introduction Thu, 20 May 2010 19:59:48 +0000 http://jonathangray.org/?p=414#comment-849 <p>[...] itself, is a long-held dream of Jonathan Gray, OKF’s Community Coordinator - a commons of open data surrounding scholarly communications. [...]</p> [...] itself, is a long-held dream of Jonathan Gray, OKF’s Community Coordinator – a commons of open data surrounding scholarly communications. [...]

]]> Comment on Bibliographica – for the collaborative development of bibliographies by Andrew Bruce http://jonathangray.org/2010/01/22/bibliographica/comment-page-1/#comment-672 Andrew Bruce Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:54:37 +0000 http://jonathangray.org/?p=414#comment-672 <p>Hey Jonny,</p> <p>Been a while. Liking the ideas. I recently worked on a story-based system for the beeb, and have a few chums interested in and working with RDF and linked data. Since I'm looking for a meaty pro bono project, wouldn't mind talking more about this.</p> <p>Good to see you, albeit in digital form,</p> <p>'Sven'</p> Hey Jonny,

Been a while. Liking the ideas. I recently worked on a story-based system for the beeb, and have a few chums interested in and working with RDF and linked data. Since I’m looking for a meaty pro bono project, wouldn’t mind talking more about this.

Good to see you, albeit in digital form,

‘Sven’

]]> Comment on Bibliographica – for the collaborative development of bibliographies by Iain Emsley http://jonathangray.org/2010/01/22/bibliographica/comment-page-1/#comment-649 Iain Emsley Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:46:27 +0000 http://jonathangray.org/?p=414#comment-649 <p>Hi Jonathan, </p> <p>I agree with Felix regarding the linked data. </p> <p>For me, the most important thing are interfaces which allow systems to interact and for users/sites to exchange data. That, to me, should be a core thing for the project.</p> <p>Iain</p> Hi Jonathan,

I agree with Felix regarding the linked data.

For me, the most important thing are interfaces which allow systems to interact and for users/sites to exchange data. That, to me, should be a core thing for the project.

Iain

]]> Comment on Bibliographica – for the collaborative development of bibliographies by Ben O'Steen http://jonathangray.org/2010/01/22/bibliographica/comment-page-1/#comment-637 Ben O'Steen Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:05:22 +0000 http://jonathangray.org/?p=414#comment-637 <p>I would have to add that FRBR/RDA isn't a good thing to base a system like this on - I am incredulous when I was shown the amount of descriptive repetition at all the levels in their model. It was as if each record (Work, Manifestation, etc) should stand alone, like a MARC record, rather than reference and rely on metadata held at other levels of the model.</p> <p>Compatible on import and perhaps on export, but I wouldn't base a system on it!</p> I would have to add that FRBR/RDA isn’t a good thing to base a system like this on – I am incredulous when I was shown the amount of descriptive repetition at all the levels in their model. It was as if each record (Work, Manifestation, etc) should stand alone, like a MARC record, rather than reference and rely on metadata held at other levels of the model.

Compatible on import and perhaps on export, but I wouldn’t base a system on it!

]]> Comment on Bibliographica – for the collaborative development of bibliographies by Owen Stephens http://jonathangray.org/2010/01/22/bibliographica/comment-page-1/#comment-579 Owen Stephens Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:54:07 +0000 http://jonathangray.org/?p=414#comment-579 <p>You may want to also look at the work that the software company Talis have been doing with their 'Aspire' product. They use the bibliontology (bibo) as suggested by Felix, but alongside this they have also created a 'resource list' ontology to enable lists of resources to be created and managed (http://vocab.org/resourcelist/schema). This thread on the bibo google group may be of interest http://groups.google.com/group/bibliographic-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/9122033c79ed5337?fwc=1&pli=1</p> You may want to also look at the work that the software company Talis have been doing with their ‘Aspire’ product. They use the bibliontology (bibo) as suggested by Felix, but alongside this they have also created a ‘resource list’ ontology to enable lists of resources to be created and managed (http://vocab.org/resourcelist/schema). This thread on the bibo google group may be of interest http://groups.google.com/group/bibliographic-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/9122033c79ed5337?fwc=1&pli=1

]]> Comment on The Magus in New York by Thomas http://jonathangray.org/2009/06/10/the-magus-in-new-york/comment-page-1/#comment-561 Thomas Mon, 15 Feb 2010 04:00:15 +0000 http://jonathangray.org/?p=38#comment-561 <p>Sounds like a delightful conference...are there plans to publish the papers?</p> Sounds like a delightful conference…are there plans to publish the papers?

]]> Comment on The Construction of Immateriality by friedemann kawohl http://jonathangray.org/2009/07/07/the-construction-of-immateriality/comment-page-1/#comment-530 friedemann kawohl Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:58:07 +0000 http://jonathangray.org/?p=187#comment-530 <p>Hi Jonathan, I have enjoyed reading your review of the Milan papers. It is a good format to briefly recall what we have heard. Thank you!</p> <p>There is just one minor correction with regard to my presentation:</p> <p>I was not Voigtländer‘s publishing firm that later became Springer, but: Voigtländer worked for some time with Julius Springer, before he returned to Kreuznach to take over his father’s publishing house. </p> <p>I have learned that the next ISHTIP meeting will be in the US, unfortunatly not in Venice. Best regards friedemann kawohl</p> Hi Jonathan, I have enjoyed reading your review of the Milan papers. It is a good format to briefly recall what we have heard. Thank you!

There is just one minor correction with regard to my presentation:

I was not Voigtländer‘s publishing firm that later became Springer, but: Voigtländer worked for some time with Julius Springer, before he returned to Kreuznach to take over his father’s publishing house.

I have learned that the next ISHTIP meeting will be in the US, unfortunatly not in Venice. Best regards friedemann kawohl

]]> Comment on Bibliographica – for the collaborative development of bibliographies by Bibliographica – open bibliographic sourcing and maintenance « The Aust Gate http://jonathangray.org/2010/01/22/bibliographica/comment-page-1/#comment-500 Bibliographica – open bibliographic sourcing and maintenance « The Aust Gate Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:37:00 +0000 http://jonathangray.org/?p=414#comment-500 <p>[...] has a thought provoking post on the need for an Open Bibliographic Service which he calls Bibliographica. As he writes: lists of publications are an absolutely critical part of scholarship. They [...]</p> [...] has a thought provoking post on the need for an Open Bibliographic Service which he calls Bibliographica. As he writes: lists of publications are an absolutely critical part of scholarship. They [...]

]]> Comment on Bibliographica – for the collaborative development of bibliographies by Tweets that mention Bibliographica - for the collaborative development of bibliographies -- Topsy.com http://jonathangray.org/2010/01/22/bibliographica/comment-page-1/#comment-499 Tweets that mention Bibliographica - for the collaborative development of bibliographies -- Topsy.com Sun, 24 Jan 2010 01:38:52 +0000 http://jonathangray.org/?p=414#comment-499 <p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jonathan Gray and Iain Emsley, whitney trettien. whitney trettien said: RT @jwyg: New project for collaboratively developing bibliographies: seeking comments/collaborators! http://bit.ly/6nwxnS #digitalhumanities [...]</p> [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jonathan Gray and Iain Emsley, whitney trettien. whitney trettien said: RT @jwyg: New project for collaboratively developing bibliographies: seeking comments/collaborators! http://bit.ly/6nwxnS #digitalhumanities [...]

]]>